Evaluating cell type deconvolution in FFPE breast tissue: application to benign breast disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transcriptome profiling using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of bulk formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks is a standard method in biomedical research. However, when used on tissues with diverse cell type compositions, it yields averaged gene expression profiles, complicating biomarker identification due to variations in cell proportions. To address the need for optimized strategies for defining individual cell type compositions from bulk FFPE samples, we constructed single-cell RNA-seq reference data for breast tissue and tested cell type deconvolution methods. Initial simulation experiments showed similar performances across multiple commonly used deconvolution methods. However, the introduction of FFPE artifacts significantly impacted their performances, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) ranging between 0.04 and 0.17. Scaden, a deep learning-based method, consistently outperformed the others, demonstrating robustness against FFPE artifacts. Testing these methods on our 62-sample RNA-seq benign breast disease cohort in which cell type composition was estimated using digital pathology approaches, we found that pre-filtering of the reference data enhanced the accuracy of most methods, realizing up to a 32% reduction in RMSE. To support further research efforts in this domain, we introduce SCdeconR, an R package designed for streamlined cell type deconvolution assessments and downstream analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".