Shell Universe: Reducing Cosmological Tensions with the Relativistic Ni Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent discoveries of massive galaxies existing in the early universe, as well as apparent anomalies in Ωm and H0 at high redshift, have raised sharp new concerns for the ΛCDM model of cosmology. Here, we address these problems by using new solutions for the Einstein field equations of relativistic compact objects originally found by Ni. Applied to the universe, the new solutions imply that the universe’s mass is relatively concentrated in a thick outer shell. The interior space would not have a flat, Minkowski metric, but rather a repulsive gravitational field centered on the origin. This field would induce a gravitational redshift in light waves moving inward from the cosmic shell and a corresponding blueshift in waves approaching the shell. Assuming the Milky Way lies near the origin, within the KBC Void, this redshift would make H0 appear to diminish at high redshifts and could thus relieve the Hubble tension. The Ni redshift could also reduce or eliminate the requirement for dark energy in the ΛCDM model. The relative dimness of distant objects would instead arise because the Ni redshift makes them appear closer to us than they really are. To account for the CMB temperature–redshift relation and for the absence of a systematic blueshift in stars closer to the origin than the Milky Way, it is proposed that the Ni redshift and blueshift involve exchanges of photon energy with a photonic spacetime. These exchanges in turn form the basis for a cosmic CMB cycle, which gives rise to gravity and an Einsteinian cosmological constant, Λ. Black holes are suggested to have analogous Ni structures and gravity/Λ cycles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".