MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401389440 · doi:10.46919/archv5n3espec-619

Prematuridade tardia: uma revisão sistemática

2024· article· pt· W4401389440 on OpenAlex
Cláudia Roldão Leite, Laura Reis de Oliveira, Thayná Pereira Beirigo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Archives of Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A prematuridade tardia refere-se aos nascimentos ocorridos entre 34 e 36 semanas de gestação, representando um desafio significativo para a saúde pública devido às complicações neonatais e ao impacto a longo prazo no desenvolvimento infantil. Este estudo realiza uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre prematuridade tardia, focando na prevalência, fatores de risco, complicações associadas, intervenções e prognóstico. Foram utilizados artigos científicos brasileiros indexados nas bases de dados PubMed, SciELO e LILACS. Os resultados indicam que a prematuridade tardia é prevalente e associada a fatores maternos, obstétricos e socioeconômicos. Complicações respiratórias, metabólicas e neurológicas são comuns nesse grupo. Intervenções perinatais específicas e cuidados neonatais intensivos são cruciais para melhorar os desfechos. Conclui-se que estratégias de prevenção e manejo adequado são essenciais para reduzir os riscos associados à prematuridade tardia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it