Circularly Polarized Modified Minkowski Metasurface-Based Hybrid Dielectric Resonator Antenna for 5G n79 Wireless Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a circularly polarized hybrid cylindrical dielectric resonator antenna (HCDRA) over a modified Minkowski unit-cell-based metasurface for 5G n79 band (4.4–5 GHz) and IEEE 802.11n WLAN (5 GHz) applications. The location of the perturbed probe feed mechanism and the asymmetric nature of the metasurface are the factors that influence the circularly polarized (CP) radiation within the DR element. The magnitude of E-field distribution and parametric study of the antenna to obtain the optimized feed location are the pieces of evidence of CP radiation. The return loss (RL) and axial ratio (AR) bandwidths produced by the proposed antenna are 1.837 GHz and 750 MHz with a peak gain of 7.04 dBic. The gain obtained is more than 5 dBic across the offered bandwidth of the proposed antenna. The proposed antenna is fabricated and tested in an anechoic chamber for measured results, and these results closely match with the simulation results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".