Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current Opinion in Cardiology was launched in 1985. It is part of a successful series of review journals whose unique format is designed to provide a systematic and critical assessment of the literature as presented in the many primary journals. The field of cardiology is divided into 14 sections that are reviewed once a year. Each section is assigned a Section Editor, a leading authority in the area, who identifies the most important topics at that time. Here we are pleased to introduce the Journal's Section Editors for this issue. SECTION EDITORS Sherif NaguehSherif NaguehDr Nagueh has a longstanding interest in the evaluation of cardiac function, particularly left ventricular diastolic function. He was the chair of the writing group for the ASE/EAE guidelines on the echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. He has done extensive research in the diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial diseases, especially dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and he was the chair of the multimodality imaging guidelines for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Dr Nagueh serves as director of the Echocardiography Laboratory at the Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center. He has several clinical studies looking at left ventricular diastolic function in patients with and without heart failure and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Subodh VermaSubodh VermaDr Subodh Verma is a cardiac surgeon-scientist, Professor and the Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Surgery. He is a Fellow of the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences, a member of the Royal Society of Canada College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists, and a past recipient of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Gold Medal in Surgery. Dr Verma is the current Scientific Program Committee Chair for the Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons. In 2022, Dr Verma was named a Clarivate Highly Cited Researcher in Clinical Medicine. He is an Associate Editor of the European Heart Journal and an active contributor to Canadian clinical practice guidelines. Dr Verma had/has leadership roles in multiple contemporary global heart failure trials – several of which have propelled paradigm changes in heart failure care. He founded the CardioLink platform that united cardiac surgeons from across Canada to conduct robust clinical trials to better inform on surgical decision-making pathways. Dr Verma leads a dynamic pre-clinical and translational research team that leverages pre-clinical disease models and clinical trial-derived data to identify novel mediators of cardiometabolic diseases. Bobby YanagawaBobby YanagawaBobby Yanagawa is the Division Head, Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada and Program Director, Division of Cardiac Surgery at the University of Toronto, Canada. Dr Yanagawa obtained his BSc and PhD from the University of British Columbia and his MD degree and Cardiac Surgery Residency from the University of Toronto, Canada. He has completed research fellowships at the University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan, and at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. He completed an advanced valvular fellowship at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York. Dr Yanagawa's clinical and research interests are, broadly, surgical revascularization, infective endocarditis and equity-diversity-inclusion. He has published over 90 peer reviewed papers, 50 reviews and 15 book chapters including publications in Nature Communications, Nature Medicine, Circulation, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Annals of Thoracic Surgery. He was the AATS 13th Annual C. Walton Lillehei Award winner in 2010.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.050 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.196 | 0.130 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".