Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores the significant contributions of Indigenous women filmmakers in Nigeria, highlighting their roles in breaking barriers and shaping narratives within the Nigerian film industry, known as Nollywood. Indigenous women have made remarkable strides in an industry traditionally dominated by men, using their platforms to challenge societal norms and advocate for gender equality. This paper discusses the historical context of Indigenous women in Nigerian cinema, profiling key figures such as Genevieve Nnaji, Kemi Adetiba, Mildred Okwo, and several others. Additionally, it examines the cultural and feminist themes prevalent in their work, the impact of their films, and the challenges they face. Special attention is given to the emerging trend of female filmmakers leveraging platforms like YouTube to produce and distribute their content. Through a detailed analysis of films such as "Lionheart," "King of Boys," and others, this paper illustrates how Indigenous women in Nigerian cinema reshape narratives and contribute to a more inclusive and diverse representation of African experiences. Including visual materials from the films discussed will enhance the understanding of the cultural and thematic elements these filmmakers bring to the screen. This paper aims to underscore the importance of supporting Indigenous women filmmakers and promoting gender equality within the film industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".