MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401407925 · doi:10.18280/rces.110202

Enhancing Steganography in 256×256 Colored Images with U-Net: A Study on PSNR and SSIM Metrics with Variable-Sized Hidden Images

2024· article· en· W4401407925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Computer Engineering Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteganographyArtificial intelligenceColoredVariable (mathematics)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionMathematicsImage (mathematics)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In digital communications, the imperative for secure data transmission is increasingly addressed through steganography, wherein information is clandestinely embedded within various digital media.This study is concerned with the enhancement of steganographic techniques through a modified U-Net architecture, designed to embed 256256 colored message images into identically sized cover images, thereby augmenting capacity for data concealment.The classical U-Net architecture has been adapted by the incorporation of batch normalization and residual blocks, aiming to refine the embedding and extraction processes's efficiency.The novel model, trained on the expansive ImageNet database, introduces the one cycle learning rate scheduler and the AdamW optimizer into the U-Net framework, achieving enhanced training efficiency, hastened convergence, and superior generalization.Validation was conducted through two distinct analyses: the first evaluating the impact of secret image size variations on the cover image within the steganographic process, and the second assessing model performance on three datasets-Linnaeus 5, ImageNet, and Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW).Empirical assessments indicate that the proposed model outperforms existing deep learning-based steganographic methods, as evidenced by the attained metrics, particularly Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM).On the Linnaeus 5 dataset, embedding yielded a PSNR of 44.4656 dB and an SSIM of 0.9897, while extraction recorded a PSNR of 43.5393 dB and an SSIM of 0.9875.The ImageNet dataset saw an embedding PSNR of 45.3966 dB and an SSIM of 0.9906, with extraction values of 44.8206 dB PSNR and 0.9903 SSIM.Notably, the LFW dataset embedding resulted in a PSNR of 48.1407 dB and an SSIM of 0.9930, and extraction achieved a PSNR of 47.5296 dB and an SSIM of 0.9907.The qualitative and quantitative outcomes affirm the efficacy of the proposed method for the secure transmission of confidential imagery, with potential applications ranging from the safeguarding of medical records to the protection of sensitive data across various digital platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it