MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401408935 · doi:10.1145/3673038.3673154

Murmuration: On-the-fly DNN Adaptation for SLO-Aware Distributed Inference in Dynamic Edge Environments

2024· article· en· W4401408935 on OpenAlexaff
Jieyu Lin, Sai Qian Zhang, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInferenceLatency (audio)Distributed computingPersonalizationEdge computingAdaptation (eye)Artificial neural networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge deviceReinforcement learningBandwidth (computing)Artificial intelligenceCloud computingMachine learningComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR) and the Internet of Things (IoT) applications is driving the demand for efficient Deep Neural Network (DNN) inference at the edge. These applications often impose stringent Service Level Objectives (SLOs), such as latency or accuracy, that must be met under the constraints of limited resources and dynamic network conditions. In this study, we explore a novel approach to DNN inference across multiple edge devices, incorporating both model customization and partitioning dynamically, to better align with these constraints and SLOs. Unlike conventional methods that employ a single fixed DNN network, our system, termed Murmuration, combines one-shot Neural Architecture Search (NAS) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to dynamically customize and partition DNN models. This approach adapts in real-time to the capabilities of the edge devices, network conditions, and varying SLO requirements. The design of Murmuration allows it to effectively navigate the large search space defined by DNN models, network delays, and bandwidth, offering a significant improvement in managing trade-offs between accuracy and latency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207