MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401414395 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3441236

Joint Computation Offloading and Multidimensional Resource Allocation in Air–Ground Integrated Vehicular Edge Computing Network

2024· article· en· W4401414395 on OpenAlex
Shichao Li, Laha Ale, Hongbin Chen, Fangqing Tan, Tony Q. S. Quek, Ning Zhang, Mianxiong Dong, Kaoru Ota

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputation offloadingJoint (building)ComputationResource allocationResource management (computing)Edge computingDistributed computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkTelecommunicationsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of vehicle edge computing (VEC) and air-ground integrated network is considered as a key technology to achieve autonomous driving. It exploits the ubiquitous service coverage and enables tasks to be offloaded to various components, such as high-altitude platform (HAP), unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), and roadside unit (RSU). In this article, we address the challenge of minimizing the overall task offloading delay in the air-ground integrated VEC network through a joint multicomputation equipment selection and multidimensional resource allocation (JCESRA) problem. Considering the nonconvexity inherent in the problem, we employ the fundamental idea of the block coordinate descent (BCD) method to tackle it. Initially, we exclude the HAP and decompose the primal problem into three subproblems: 1) low-altitude computation equipment selection; 2) joint bandwidth and computation resource allocation; and 3) UAV trajectory design. The first subproblem, which involves integer programming, is solved by using the many-to-one matching method. Meanwhile, we utilize the CVX and successive convex approximation (SCA) method to solve the last two subproblems, respectively. Considering the matching externality, we utilize the coalition game method to deal with it. Based on the solutions of the three subproblems, the JCESRA algorithm without considering the HAP has been proposed. Subsequently, we consider the HAP into the problem. Because the task offloading decision and computation resource allocation of the HAP problem can be viewed as a knapsack problem, we utilize the dynamic programming method to solve it. Because some tasks are offloaded to the HAP, there are some redundant computation resources in UAVs and RSU. We reallocate the computation resources of UAVs and RSU to further reduce the task offloading delay. At last, we present the complete JCESRA algorithm. The simulation results unequivocally indicate that the proposed JCESRA algorithm outperforms other algorithms by significantly reducing the task offloading delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it