Local lateral connectivity is sufficient for replicating cortex-like topographical organization in deep neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Across the primate cortex, neurons that perform similar functions tend to be spatially grouped together. This biological principle extends to many other species as well, reflecting a common way of organizing sensory processing across diverse forms of life. In the visual cortex, this biological principle manifests itself as a modular organization of neuronal clusters, each tuned to a specific visual property. The tendency toward short connections is widely believed to explain the existence of such an organization in the brains of many animals. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear. Here, we use artificial deep neural network models to demonstrate that a topographical organization akin to that in the primary, intermediate, and high-level human visual cortex emerges when units in these models are locally laterally connected and their weight parameters are tuned by top-down credit assignment. The emergence of modular organization without explicit topography-inducing learning rules or objective functions challenges their necessity and suggests that local lateral connectivity alone may suffice for the formation of topographic organization across the cortex. Furthermore, the incorporation of lateral connections in deep convolutional networks enhances their robustness to subtle alterations in visual inputs, such as those designed to deceive the model (i.e. adversarial examples), indicating an additional role for these connections in learning robust representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".