MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401416789 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3440320

A Clockless Derivative-Dependent Sampling Scheme for Energy-Efficient IoT Applications

2024· article· en· W4401416789 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Elmi, Motaz M. Elbadry, Nan Jiang, Kambiz Moez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Derivative (finance)Sampling (signal processing)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a clockless nonuniform sampling scheme to enhance the energy efficiency of Internet of Things (IoT) applications. The proposed scheme employs a derivative-dependent mechanism that provides enhanced accuracy compared to other nonuniform sampling schemes while minimizing power consumption. By continuously monitoring the change in the derivative of the input signal, the proposed scheme identifies the most significant points of the signal, valuable for retention and conversion for effective signal reconstruction. In this scheme, the change in the derivative of the signal is compared to tunable threshold references, enabling adjustability to obtain the desired level of accuracy and adaptability to a variety of IoT applications. The proposed scheme is implemented in low- and high-speed systems that target low- and high-frequency applications, respectively. Fabricated using TSMC’s 0.13-$\mu $m CMOS technology, the performance is evaluated through experimental results in real-world scenarios. The proposed clockless derivative dependent sampling (CL-DDS) system can be integrated into the data acquisition system of an IoT device/sensor to save its critical power budget, while the threshold references are tuned to achieve the desired accuracy. The maximum power consumption of the proposed low- and high-speed CL-DDS designs is$1.15~\mu $W (@1 MHz) and$8.81~\mu $W (@20 MHz), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207