Bibliographic record
Abstract
By far the majority of people in our world live in economically precarious communities in which daily experiences of material indignity are reinforced by disrespectful treatment from public authorities. Although these communities experience the collective trauma of material indignity and social nonrecognition, they tend to engage frequently in collective activism to demand dignified lives. Sometimes the collective action is very public, e.g. street protests against the lack of sanitation. At other times the collective action is less public and under the radar, embedded in everyday livelihood activities. These forms of activism not intended as political; they emerge out of necessity. In this paper I explore a number of inter-related questions: what kind of political activation emerges from experiences of being treated less than human in material and recognition terms? What kind of psychological frame does political activation offer for the emergence of identity and subjectivity? How do people move between experiences of painful non- recognition toward political thoughts (and collective action) about being rightful citizens? What does it mean for unformulated experience to become represented through political activation as a mode of building a sense of self with one another? The paper seeks to contribute to a fruitful dialogue on activism between psychoanalysis and the social sciences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".