The $s$-Weak Order and $s$-Permutahedra II: The Combinatorial Complex of Pure Intervals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces the geometric foundations for the study of the $s$-permutahedron and the $s$-associahedron, two objects that encode the underlying geometric structure of the $s$-weak order and the $s$-Tamari lattice. We introduce the $s$-permutahedron as the complex of pure intervals of the $s$-weak order, present enumerative results about its number of faces, and prove that it is a combinatorial complex. This leads, in particular, to an explicit combinatorial description of the intersection of two faces. We also introduce the $s$-associahedron as the complex of pure $s$-Tamari intervals of the $s$-Tamari lattice, show some enumerative results, and prove that it is isomorphic to a well chosen $\nu$-associahedron. Finally, we present three polytopality conjectures, evidence supporting them, and some hints about potential generalizations to other finite Coxeter groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".