MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401420358 · doi:10.1364/ao.530314

Characteristics of an ion beam in the figuring process on an optical ultra-low expansion glass surface

2024· article· en· W4401420358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsMD Precision (Canada)
FundersNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsFiguringMaterials scienceOpticsIon beamBeam (structure)Full width at half maximumIonOptoelectronicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an ion source figured out the surface of a glass-ceramic material with an ultra-low thermal expansion coefficient for space optical elements. The investigation of the single-point, line, and square figuring patterns assessed the detailed characteristics of the ion beam. At a fixed ion beam current and processing time, a beam voltage of 600 V led to the greatest removal depth with the narrowest full width at half-maximum (FWHM). The surface roughness under different beam voltages was also examined and discussed. Line figuring with an ion beam voltage of 600 V and a one-dimensional sample moving speed of 0.25 mm/s exhibited a maximum depth removal rate of 19.71 nm/min after being polished 15 times. Two-dimensional square figuring was performed to polish a plane mirror with a diameter of 60 mm, and it successfully reduced its surface’s peak-to-valley value to 18 nm due to the melting heat phenomenon of the glass-ceramic material in ion beam figuring (IBF).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it