MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401420947 · doi:10.1016/j.cont.2024.101340

Lower urinary tract dysfunction in uncommon neurological diseases, Part III: A report of the Neuro-urology Promotion Committee of the International Continence Society

2024· article· en· W4401420947 on OpenAlexaff
Ryuji Sakakibara, Sanjay Sinha, Stefan De Wachter, Blayne Welk, Desiree Vrijens, Charalampos Konstantinidis, Christina‐Anastasia Rapidi, Luís Abranches Monteiro, Cristiano Mendes Gomes, Marcus J. Drake

Bibliographic record

VenueContinence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromotion (chess)Urinary systemMedicineUrologyUrinary continenceGeneral surgeryInternal medicinePolitical scienceLawProstate cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the third manuscript from the Neuro-urology Promotion Committee of the International Continence Society (ICS) discussing uncommon neuro-urological conditions that are not well described in urological literature. Readers are referred to the previous documents for a more detailed understanding of how neurological disease might affect lower urinary tract function ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cont.2022.100022) ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cont.2023.101043). Eleven conditions are covered. This includes five genetic conditions — Angelman disease, spinocerebellar ataxias, Fabry's disease, neurofibromatosis and spinal muscular atrophy. Two infection associated conditions are covered including Human T-lymphotropic Virus Type 1 associated myelopathy/ tropical spastic paraparesis and Creutzfeldt–Jackob disease. Four other conditions covered are cerebral palsy, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and spinal vascular malformation. Key aspects and specific recommendations related to clinical practice are summarized in tables. Knowledge of unusual neurological conditions that can affect the lower urinary tract is important for ensuring a timely and precise diagnosis. This document from the ICS, along with Parts I and II published earlier, can serve as a reference for clinicians presented with unusual forms of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContinenceSame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207