Bulky phosphine ligands promote palladium-catalysed protodeboronation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction is plagued by protodeboronation, an undesirable side reaction with water that consumes the boronic acid derivatives required for the cross-coupling reaction. Meticulous mechanistic studies have previously established protodeboronation to be highly sensitive to the nature of the boronic reagent and reaction conditions. Particularly, the presence of bases, which are essential for the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, is known to catalyse protodeboronation. However, protodeboronation catalysed by palladium-phosphine complexes, the benchmark catalyst system for Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling, has been largely overlooked. We demonstrate, using automated high-throughput experimentation, comprehensive computational mechanistic analyses and kinetic modelling, that protodeboronation is accelerated by palladium(II) complexes bound to bulky phosphine ligands. While sterically hindered ligands are typically used to facilitate difficult cross-couplings, these ligands can instead paradoxically impede cross-coupling product formation, requiring careful and judicious consideration when choosing ligands for Suzuki-Miyaura cross-couplings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".