Research on the Path of Artificial Intelligence Empowering High-quality Economic Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of science and technology, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a new driving force to promote economic and social development with its powerful capabilities of data processing, autonomous learning and decision support. This study analyzes the mechanism of AI promoting high-quality economic development, and discusses its specific implementation path, which provides useful guidance and suggestions for practice. It is found that AI has played a positive role in promoting high-quality economic development through its characteristics of permeability, synergy, substitution and creativity. The wide application of AI not only improves production efficiency and reduces operating costs, but also promotes the development of emerging industries and injects new vitality into economic growth. In order to effectively apply AI technology to empower high-quality economic development, this study puts forward some paths, such as strengthening basic research and key technology research and development, optimizing industrial development environment, deepening the integrated application of AI and traditional industries, and cultivating and expanding AI industry. In the concrete implementation, it is suggested that the government, enterprises and research institutions should make joint efforts to strengthen technology research and development, optimize the policy environment, and promote industrial integration and innovative application. At the same time, we should pay attention to the security and privacy protection of AI technology to ensure the sustainable development of technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".