MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401428853 · doi:10.1144/geochem2024-008

Whole rock lithogeochemical analysis of the Mount Read Volcanics: a new tool for geochemical exploration

2024· article· en· W4401428853 on OpenAlexaff
Zebedee Zivkovic, Scott Halley, Mike Vicary, Michael J. Baker, Matthew J. Cracknell, Shaun L.L. Barker

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersTasmanian Government
KeywordsGeologyVolcanic rockStratigraphyOutcropPyroxeneGeochemistryGeologic mapVolcanoPaleontologyPetrologyTectonicsOlivine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mount Read Volcanics (MRV) of western Tasmania is a belt of Middle to Late Cambrian submarine volcanics and volcaniclastics and one of the major base and precious metal provinces within Australia. Exploration success in the MRV has been in decline in recent years due to a variety of challenges including intensely altered rocks with complex stratigraphy and lithofacies variation, and a lack of accessible outcrop. As a result, local and regional mapping of the MRV is often restricted to Group-level stratigraphy, rendering geological mapping ineffective for identifying decametre-scale mine stratigraphy. Surface rock chip and drill hole samples were collected and analysed using commercially available geochemical assays to create a regional geochemical dataset of the MRV, covering the entire province and all major stratigraphic units. From these data, a lithogeochemical methodology was developed, utilizing Ti/Nb and V/Sc systematics that effectively characterizes the samples according to composition and magmatic processes. This method is shown to be robust to biases due to alteration and lithofacies, eliminating the need for highly selective sampling or extensive data filtering. To demonstrate the utility of this method in an exploration context, data from the K-lens of the Rosebery polymetallic volcanic-hosted massive sulfide (VHMS) deposit was used as a case study. Using Ti/Nb–V/Sc systematics, a rock composition classification was developed that allowed for discrimination of the footwall, hanging wall and host stratigraphy of the Rosebery mine sequence. A geochemical fingerprint for the footwall stratigraphy to mineralization was developed, and by correlating this signature to the regional unclassified samples, geochemical analogues for the Rosebery footwall were readily identified. This approach rapidly reduces the exploration search space and provides valuable information for future mineral exploration. The methodology is applicable in other terrains; however, appropriate orientation studies are required to investigate potential biases due to lithofacies, alteration and mineralogical variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Exploration Environment AnalysisSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207