Dynamics of Quarter Life Crisis in the Perspective of Kawruh Jiwa Ki Ageng Suryomentaram
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter Life Crisis is a crisis that is often experienced in emerging adulthood. College students are one of the most vulnerable to this crisis due to various difficulties in the current era. This study examines the dynamics of the quarter life crisis faced by Yogyakarta students and looks at this crisis with Kawruh Jiwa Ki Ageng Suryomentaram perspective's which contains the values and philosophical concepts of Indonesian society. This research also examines alternative solutions of the quarter life crisis based on the Ki Ageng Suryomentaram perspective. The research method is phenomenological qualitative research and library research. The results of this study show that individuals in quarter life crisis feel anxiety about their life followed by some typical behaviors that affect self-functioning. According to Suryomentaram's perspective, the quarter life crisis is related to "Rasa '' and "Karep '' which Mulur mungkret (raise-shrink) causes Bungah (happy) and Susah (Sad). Coping with the quarter life crisis is about self-regulation which in Ki Ageng Suryomentaram is focused on " Pangawikan Pribadi" and "Mawas Diri".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".