MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401435911 · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljae266.034

655 - Long-term safety and efficacy of delgocitinib cream for up to 36 weeks in adults with chronic hand eczema: results of the phase 3 open-label extension DELTA-3 trial

2024· article· en· W4401435911 on OpenAlexaff
Melinda Gooderham, Sonja Molin, Robert Bissonnette, Margitta Worm, M.N. Crépy, Luca Stingeni, Richard B. Warren, Sibylle Schliemann, Cherry Lou Balita-Crisostomo, Marie Louise Oesterdal, Tove Agner

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectClinical endpointOpen labelClinical trialDeltaInternal medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction/Background In patients with moderate to severe Chronic Hand Eczema (CHE), delgocitinib cream, a topical pan-Janus kinase inhibitor, was well tolerated and demonstrated significant improvement in all efficacy endpoints in DELTA-1 and -2. Objectives The objectives of this study were to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of twice-daily applications of delgocitinib cream 20 mg/g as needed for up to 36 weeks in adults with CHE in the Phase 3 open-label DELTA-3 trial (NCT04949841), an extension trial of the 16-week DELTA-1 (NCT04871711) and DELTA-2 (NCT04872101) trials. Methods In DELTA-3, subjects who completed the 16-week (W) treatment period in DELTA-1 and DELTA-2 were treated on an as-needed basis with twice-daily delgocitinib cream 20 mg/g for 36 weeks (n=801). Subjects with Investigator's Global Assessment for CHE (IGA-CHE) ≥2 received delgocitinib cream until symptoms resolved (i.e., IGA-CHE 0/1 [clear/almost clear]). Primary endpoint was number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Key secondary endpoints were IGA-CHE 0/1 and ≥75%/≥90% improvement in Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI-75/90) scores; Hand Eczema Symptom eDiary captured patient-reported worst severity of itch/pain over the past 24 hours. Results No safety concerns were identified during delgocitinib cream treatment in DELTA-1 (n=325; R=305.4; PYO=100.9), DELTA-2 (n=313; R=280.6; PYO=95.9) and DELTA-3 (n=801; R=231.1; PYO=535.7). In DELTA-3, the most frequent TEAEs were COVID-19 and nasopharyngitis. In DELTA-3, IGA-CHE 0/1, HECSI-75, HECSI-90 and ≥4-point itch/pain reduction were maintained from baseline (24.6%, 51.8%, 31.8%, and 50.6%/51.9%, respectively) to W36 (30.0%, 58.6%, 36.6%, and 52.4%/55.4%, respectively) among delgocitinib cream-treated subjects in the parent trials. Among those treated with cream vehicle in parent trials, response rates improved from baseline (9.1%, 23.7%, 12.0%, and 26.3%/32.3%, respectively) to W36 (29.5%, 51.5%, 35.7%, and 41.3%/43.3%, respectively). Conclusions Overall, with delgocitinib cream 20 mg/g treatment no safety concerns were identified and efficacy further improved, supporting the benefit of long-term as-needed use of delgocitinib cream in patients with moderate to severe CHE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of DermatologySame topicDupuytren's Contracture and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207