MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401436003 · doi:10.36277/geoekonomi.v15i1.339

ANALISIS SPASIAL: MELACAK TRANSFORMASI LAHAN GAMBUT DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP EKONOMI MASYARAKAT

2024· article· en· W4401436003 on OpenAlexaff
Dian Wisnu Ajie Saputro, Indrawan Permana Kamis, Herwin Sutrisno

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal GeoEkonomi · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraditional medicineGeographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to determine the condition of land use changes in peatlands. Where peatlands determine the resilience of Palangka Raya City through the level of vulnerability to disasters due to land and forest fires in peat conservation areas in the future. The literature review method was used in this research. The research results reveal that land resilience in Palangka Raya City, spatial and land planning factors need to be based on rational considerations in accordance with the existing potential of the area, so that there is efficient use of space without reducing land quality. Then, land conservation factors in Palangka Raya City are stipulated in spatial planning regulations which regulate the delineation and arrangement of cultivation areas and protected areas, developing protected areas as buffer zones, delineation and arrangement of agricultural areas. There are threats to land security in the form of flood disasters, rapid rates of urbanization or immigration, as well as various shocks and pressures, both caused by nature and humans. We need to be aware of this threat so that the peatland ecosystem in Palangka Raya City can be well maintained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal GeoEkonomiSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207