MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401437052 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35202

Prognostic significance of non-coding RNAs related to the tumorigenic epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process among ovarian cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4401437052 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Seyedeh Nazanin Salimian, Saghar Mehraban, Afshin Bahramy, Narges Zafari, Abdol‐Mohammad Kajbafzadeh, Joshua R. Johnson, Masoumeh Majidi Zolbin

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpithelial–mesenchymal transitionMeta-analysisOvarian cancerOncologyEpithelial ovarian cancerBiologyCancerLong non-coding RNAInternal medicineBioinformaticsCancer researchMedicineComputational biologyRNAGeneMetastasisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Ovarian cancer is the seventh most prevalent cancer among women. It has high mortality and morbidity and imposes a great burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Unraveling the mechanisms behind the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and finding a panel for predicting the prognosis of the disease may help find the appropriate treatment approaches for the management of the disease. The overarching aim of this systematic review was to define a panel of different types of EMT-associated non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) with significant prognostic value in all types of ovarian cancers. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase till Jun 2024 to retrieve relevant papers. Two independent reviewers screened papers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Publications related to the dysregulation of different types of ncRNAs, including microRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, only in patients with ovarian cancer were included. The participation of ncRNAs in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation should be assessed via methods evaluating different EMT-related proteins. To assess the quality and risk of bias for the included case-control and cohort studies, refined Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Quadas-2 were recruited. A bivariate meta-analysis was performed to analyze extracted data. Results: A total of 37 studies with overall 42 non-coding RNAs (15 microRNA, 24 long non-coding RNAs, and 3 circular RNAs) were entered into the analysis. Overall diagnostic odds ratio for ncRNAs in lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM stage, and clinical stage were 4.19, 3.80, 6.52, and 3.97, respectively. Also, a hazard ratio of 1.39 (P = 0.32) for overall survival was observed. Bioinformatic analyses on the Pan-cancer database demonstrated a significant correlation between low expression of miRNA and high expression of lncRNAs with poor prognosis of ovarian cancer. Conclusion: Based on the results, the defined panel of ncRNAs can properly predict prognostic factors related to EMT in ovarian cancer without involving potentially invasive methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207