MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401437752 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.05.606716

Evolution of <i>sex hormone-binding globulin</i> gene expression in the primate testis

2024· preprint· en· W4401437752 on OpenAlexaff
Warren M. Meyers, Geoffrey L. Hammond

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex hormone-binding globulinPrimateBiologyGeneEvolutionary biologyGene expressionHormoneGeneticsEndocrinologyEcologyAndrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In lower mammals testicular sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), also known as androgen binding protein, is well known to be a product of the Sertoli cells. However in humans, testicular SHBG is a product of the germ cells, is expressed from an upstream promoter and contains an alternative first exon 1A. Examination of testicular SHBG transcripts from members across primate suborders revealed that transcripts containing exon 1A are unique to Hominoids and Old World Monkeys. In contrast testicular SHBG transcripts in gray mouse lemur contained the proximal exon 1, while no evidence for SHBG expression could be detected in marmoset monkey testes. In general, the exonic identity of primate testicular SHBG transcripts could be predicted based on the structure of their gene’s 5’ regulatory region and we show that they change through the primate clade. This work provides insights into how molecular evolution of higher primate SHBG genes has resulted in distinct changes in how it is expressed in their testes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities→French-language works237,207→