Neuropeptide Y Y2 Receptors in Sensory Neurons Tonically Suppress Nociception and Itch but Facilitate Postsurgical and Neuropathic Pain Hypersensitivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y2 receptor (Y2) antagonist BIIE0246 can both inhibit and facilitate nociception. The authors hypothesized that Y2 function depends on inflammation or nerve injury status. METHODS: The authors implemented a battery of behavioral tests in mice of both sexes that received (1) no injury; (2) an incision model of postoperative pain; (3) a spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain; and (4) a latent sensitization model of chronic postsurgical pain. In addition to Y2 gene expression assays, spinal Y2 G-protein coupling was studied with guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding assays. RESULTS: The authors report that intrathecal BIIE0246 increased mechanical and cold hypersensitivity, produced behavioral signs of spontaneous nociception and itch, and produced conditioned place aversion and preference in normal, uninjured mice. BIIE0246 did not change heat hypersensitivity or motor coordination. Conditional (sensory neuron-specific) Y2 deletion prevented BIIE0246-induced mechanical and cold hypersensitivity, nocifensive behaviors, and aversion. Both conditional deletion and pharmacologic blockade of Y2 reduced mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity after incision or nerve injury. SNI did not change the sensitivity of Y2 G-protein coupling with the Y2 agonist peptide YY (3-36) (PYY3-36), but increased the population of Y2 that effectively coupled G-proteins. Intrathecal PYY3-36 failed to reduce spared nerve injury- or incision-induced hypersensitivity in C57BL/6N mice. Incision did not change Npy2r gene expression in dorsal root ganglion. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that Y2 at central terminals of primary afferent neurons provides tonic inhibition of mechanical and cold nociception and itch. This switches to the promotion of mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in models of acute and chronic postsurgical and neuropathic pain, perhaps due to an increase in the population of Y2 that effectively couples to G-proteins. These results support the development of Y2 antagonists for the treatment of chronic postsurgical and neuropathic pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".