MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401442309 · doi:10.1002/jcph.6108

Pharmacokinetics of Dexamethasone in Children and Adolescents with Obesity

2024· article· en· W4401442309 on OpenAlexaff
Jiali Wen, Sean McCann, Stephen J. Balevic, William J. Muller, Chi D. Hornik, Julie Autmizguine, Sarah G. Anderson, Elizabeth H. Payne, Sitora Turdalieva, Daniel González

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal Hormones and Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersDuke Clinical Research InstituteNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of PennsylvaniaWichita Medical Research and Education FoundationEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentPenn State College of MedicineChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia
KeywordsMedicineDexamethasoneDosingPharmacokineticsPopulationObesityNONMEMInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dexamethasone is a synthetic glucocorticoid approved for treating disorders of various organ systems in both adult and pediatric populations. Currently, approved pediatric dosing recommendations are weight-based, but it is unknown whether differences in dexamethasone drug disposition and exposure exist for children with obesity. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for dexamethasone with data collected from children with obesity. Dexamethasone was given as either IV or oral/enteral administration, and a salt factor correction was used for dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection. A PopPK analysis using dexamethasone plasma concentration versus time was performed using the software NONMEM. A virtual population of 1000 children with obesity across three age groups was generated for dosing simulations. Data from 59 study participants with 82 PK plasma samples were used in the PopPK analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and the inclusion of total body weight as a covariate characterized the data. No other covariates were included in the PopPK model. Single and multiple IV dose(s) of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg every 8 h resulted in 68% or more of virtual children with obesity attaining simulated exposures that were within exposure ranges previously reported in adult studies. In conclusion, this was the first study to characterize dexamethasone's PopPK in children with obesity. Simulation results suggest that virtual children with obesity receiving oral doses of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg had generally comparable dexamethasone exposures as adult estimates. Additional studies are needed to characterize the dexamethasone's target exposure in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicAdrenal Hormones and DisordersFrench-language works237,207