MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401448974 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2023-0361

Understanding the dynamics of fish spawning phenology and habitat in a changing ecosystem using a long-term ichthyoplankton monitoring dataset

2024· article· en· W4401448974 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noah Hunt, Katrina Rokosz, Yong Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStony Brook University
KeywordsIchthyoplanktonPhenologyHabitatEcosystemFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryEcologyTerm (time)Environmental scienceBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As ecosystems change, understanding the consequences for fish population dynamics and habitat use is essential for resource management. Using white perch ( Morone americana) survey data on early life stages collected during a long-term ichthyoplankton monitoring program in the Hudson River (New York, USA), an ecosystem under immense pressure from climate change, ecological shifts, and anthropogenic activities, we evaluated the drivers of changes in egg abundance and spawning habitat between 1980 and 2017. Results indicated that egg abundance is associated nonlinearly with temperature, conductivity, discharge, depth, location, and the week of year. We also found that egg abundance has declined within the river over time. Additionally, shifts in hotspots of spawning activity were identified, including evidence that the lower extent of spawning habitat has moved upriver since 1980. This study indicates that the dynamics of white perch early life histories and spawning habitat are changing. It also highlights the utility of a long-term monitoring program for broadening our understanding of fish ecology in the age of big data in changing ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→