MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401450020 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.08.607230

A somatic afterhyperpolarization is driven by ion channel nodes across a Spectrin Polygonal Lattice

2024· preprint· en· W4401450020 on OpenAlexaff
Wilten Nicola, Ray W. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersIndian Council of Medical Research
KeywordsSpectrinSomaCytoskeletonBiophysicsCalciumGatingHippocampal formationChemistryIon channelActinNeuroscienceBiologyBiochemistryCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary A spectrin-actin cytoskeleton defines the structure of axons and expression of ion channels that support spike propagation, but it is not known how calcium and potassium channels are organized at the soma to control spike output patterns. The hippocampal pyramidal cell slow afterhyperpolarization (sAHP) is generated by a CaRyK protein complex of Cav1.3 calcium, RyR2, and IK potassium channels reflecting an ER-PM junction. Super resolution imaging and dimension reduction identified a highly organized distribution of CaRyK protein clusters aligned as rows with ∼155 nm periodicity that extended to branchpoints to form a non-rigid lattice-like structure across the soma. All CaRyK proteins proved to align and colocalize with the polygonal spectrin βII cytoskeleton. The data indicate that CaRyK proteins at ER-PM junctions that contribute to the sAHP to control the pattern of spike output are distributed with high precision as functional ion channel nodes across the somatic spectrin cytoskeletal network. Graphical Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→