MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401450027 · doi:10.3138/jrpc-2022-0058

Unruly Souls: The Digital Activism of Muslim and Christian Feminists

2024· article· en· W4401450027 on OpenAlex
Corrina Laughlin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Religion and Popular Culture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Religion, Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesPolitical activismReligious studiesSociologySocial activismPolitical sciencePhilosophyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hip-hop artist in a hijab stares defiantly at the camera in a YouTube music video.A Twitter user jokes about the trauma she endured in Christian purity culture.Two women laugh on a podcast as they talk about "gender apartheid" in American Christianity.These are among the tactics of resistance that Kristin Peterson spotlights in Unruly Souls: the digital activism of Muslim and Christian feminists.Peterson dedicates her book to "all the unruly souls," signalling at the outset that she sees the work of the religious feminists that she chronicles as full of revolutionary potential."Unruliness," for Peterson, is about a lack of fit, as in those women who do not conform-because of their race, their size, or their beliefs-to the normative frame of womanhood constructed by patriarchal religious traditions.But unruliness also implies a playful sort of agency exemplified by the way that women use seemingly innocuous digital practices like meme-ification and selfie-taking as transgressive acts that challenge domination.As Peterson explains, "traditional religious spaces rarely welcome criticism from the margins, so digital spaces like Twitter, Instagram, podcasts, and digital videos offer creative outlets for these significant critiques" (93).Peterson argues that digital media enable and incubate new feminist critiques of religious traditions.In Unruly Souls, the author takes a broad view of the digital toolkit at the disposal of religious feminist activists by analyzing Twitter discourse, Instagram influencers, popular podcasts, and YouTube music videos.In her first chapter, Peterson carefully lays out the intersecting hierarchies that structure racial, religious, and gender oppression in American society.She begins with American evangelical Christians and explains how this group has successfully syncretized their religious exegeses to support white supremacy and male dominance, in effect marginalizing Black Christians and women.Following on from this, she charts how American Christians see Muslims either as in need of saving or as enemies in a holy war, and she traces these discourses to European colonial thought.Peterson does not fall into the trap of seeing religious feminism as birthed by the internet's possibilities, and, in this chapter, she looks back to the scholars of religious feminism, many of them "unruly souls" themselves, that preceded those she chronicles in this book.Peterson makes the interesting choice to examine two different religious traditions in her case studies: Christianity and Islam, and she focuses on the cultural, rather than the theological or formal expressions of these faiths.Chapter two looks at how Christians, organizing first through message boards and Facebook groups and then through Twitter hashtags, used humour and meme-ification to collectively recover from the trauma associated with Christian purity culture.In doing so, Peterson argues, these women created the activist networks that would scaffold the later #ChurchToo movement that ultimately led to several known abusers being removed from positions of authority in evangelicalism.Chapter three switches to examine unruly Muslim influencers on Instagram whose self-fashioning subverts both colloquially understood stereotypes about pious Muslim women and normative gender expression on

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it