MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Uncertainty Quantification with Subspace Pursuit for FDTD Based Microwave Circuit Models

2024· article· en· W4401453054 on OpenAlexaff
Sicheng An, Hao Qin, Xingqi Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodSubspace topologyMicrowaveComputer scienceMicrowave imagingElectronic engineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) method has been employed to quantify the uncertainty of microwave structures, offering advantages over the conventionally used yet computationally burdensome Monte Carlo (MC) method. However, the computational cost experiences a significant increase with the number of input random variables, known as the "curse of dimensionality". In this paper, we applied a subspace pursuit algorithm to improve the computational efficiency of PCE, particularly within the domain of uncertainty analysis of finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) models of microwave circuits. The performance of the proposed approach is demonstrated by modeling a cascaded stub filter with 13 material and geometric parameters, showcasing a notable computational advantage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207