Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grain boundary (GB) migration stands as a linchpin process governing microstructural evolution in polycrystalline materials. Over the past decade, the concept of shear coupling, quantified through the shear coupling factor, has transformed our understanding and driven the development of theoretical frameworks for unifying GB behaviors. In this study, we introduced a novel concept of shear coupling strength designed to overcome the limitations of the conventional shear coupling factor, notably its deficiency in conveying "coupling" information. The shear coupling tensor formed by the shear coupling strengths characterizes intrinsic shear coupling properties across diverse GBs and reveals complex dynamics within the GB mobility tensor. The molecular dynamics simulation confirms the symmetry of the GB mobility tensor. This symmetry is inherently built into the shear coupling strength, aligning with an assumption made in previous studies. Additionally, an efficient methodology has been developed for streamlined extraction of both shear coupling and GB mobility tensors from atomistic simulations. This advancement holds the potential to sample GB behavior across extensive datasets, significantly enhancing our ability to predict structure-property relationships within the expansive 5-parameter space of GBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".