MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401457888 · doi:10.1002/mds.29965

Probabilistic Refinement of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy Targeting for Parkinson's Disease Tremor

2024· article· en· W4401457888 on OpenAlexafffund
Cletus Cheyuo, Jürgen Germann, Kazuaki Yamamoto, Zion Zibly, Vibhor Krishna, Can Sarica, Yuri Ferreira Felloni Borges, Artur Vetkas, Suneil K. Kalia, Mojgan Hodaie, Alfonso Fasano, Michael L. Schwartz, W. Jeffrey Elias, Andrés M. Lozano

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreToronto Western HospitalKrembil FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsEssential tremorThalamotomyMedicineCohortMovement disordersMagnetic resonance imagingParkinson's diseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationNuclear medicineDeep brain stimulationRadiologyDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background There remains high variability in clinical outcomes when the same magnetic resonance image‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy target is used for both essential tremor (ET) and tremor‐dominant Parkinson's disease (TDPD). Objective Our goal is to refine the MRgFUS thalamotomy target for TDPD versus ET. Methods We retrospectively performed voxel‐wise efficacy and structural connectivity mapping using 3‐12‐month post‐procedure hand tremor scores for a multicenter cohort of 32 TDPD patients and a previously published cohort of 79 ET patients, and 24‐hour T1‐weighted post‐MRgFUS brain images. We validated our findings using Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III scores for an independent cohort of nine TDPD patients. Results The post‐MRgFUS clinical improvements were 45.9% ± 35.9%, 55.5% ± 36%, and 46.1% ± 18.6% for ET, multicenter TDPD and validation TDPD cohorts, respectively. The TDPD and ET efficacy maps differed significantly ( p permute < 0.05), with peak TDPD improvement (87%) at x = −13.5; y = −15.0; z = 1.5, ~3.5 mm anterior and 3 mm dorsal to the ET target. Discriminative connectivity projections were to the motor and premotor regions in TDPD, and to the motor and somatosensory regions in ET. The disorder‐specific voxel‐wise efficacy map could be used to estimate outcome in TDPD patients with high accuracy ( R = 0.8; R 2 = 0.64; P < 0.0001). The model was validated using the independent cohort of nine TDPD patients ( R = 0.73; R 2 = 0.53; P = 0.025—voxel analysis). Conclusion We demonstrated that the most effective MRgFUS thalamotomy target in TDPD is in the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior border region. This finding offers new insights into the thalamic regions instrumental in tremor control, with pivotal implications for improving treatment outcomes. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207