MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401458172 · doi:10.1115/omae2024-124607

A Critical Review of the Correlations Used for Predicting the Onset of the Transition Flow Regime in Pipe Flow of Yield Stress Fluids

2024· review· en· W4401458172 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulla Abou-Kassem, Shuang Jing, Sina Ghaemi, Ergün Kuru

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)Yield (engineering)MechanicsStress (linguistics)Statistical physicsThermodynamicsPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we present a critical review of the models used for predicting onset of the transition flow regime in pipe flow of yield stress fluids. Using the experimental data obtained by the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique, we developed a new methodology to identify the beginning of the transition flow regime in pipe flow of yield stress fluids. The new method was then used to evaluate the accuracy of the existing transition flow regime model predictions. The proposed approach relies on the boundary layer theory to classify flow into laminar and turbulent. The boundary layer theory enables microscopic characterization of the flow transition that translates into a more in-depth fundamental understanding of the transition phenomena. The corresponding literature, experimental validation, and proof of the concept are presented. We investigated 36 possible permutations of Reynolds number (Re) and critical Reynolds number (Recrit.) definitions (i.e., six Re definitions combined with six critical Re definitions), and in none of these cases, the onset of the transition regime was accurately and consistently predicted. It was noted that the percentage difference between the maximum and minimum values of Re, for the same flow rate and fluid properties, ranged between 27% to 58%, based on fluid properties and flow rate combination, mainly because of the subjectivity of the Re definitions. In order to ensure an accurate prediction of the transition zone, test fluids were designed to have a wide range of generalized Reynolds numbers (i.e., 20 to 9000, as defined by the API-RP:13D) within the physical capacity of the experimental facility (i.e. for a given pipe diameter, maximum pressure capacity of the flow loop and maximum available pump flow rate). The yield stress of the test fluids varied from 0.10 to 0.95 Pa (determined by using the nonlinear curve fitting technique recommended by the API RP:13-D). Results indicated that most of the current transition criteria for the pipe flow of yield power law (YPL) fluids have low accuracy and lack of consistency to predict the onset of the actual transition regime as compared to the data measured by using the PIV technique. This was regardless of the Reynolds number definition used. The proposed PIV measurement-based criterion provides an objective measure that can be used to develop more accurate future transition models or improve the accuracy of existing transition criteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207