An expanded framework toward improving the detritylation reaction in solid-phase oligonucleotide syntheses – filling the gap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A few interactions should be considered during the detritylation reaction of solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis (SPOS): (i) interaction of solvent with acid; (ii) interaction (or reaction) of solvent with trityl cation, and (iii) interaction of scavenger with acid, with the last one as the focus of this work. Using a stopped-flow setup, commonly used trityl cation scavengers (methanol, thioanisole, 1-dodecanethiol, triisopropylsilane, triethylsilane, and trihexylsilane) were evaluated for their reactivity toward tritylium hexafluorophosphate. Among the scavengers screened, methanol and thioanisole were found to be the most and least reactive, respectively; however, methanol does interact and react with trichloroacetic acid, thus it should not be pre-mixed and stored with acid as deblock solutions. Overall, all aspects of interactions must be taken into consideration while optimizing the detritylation reaction, especially for large scale SPOS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".