MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401465624 · doi:10.62051/eak60y63

Does Firm’s ESG performance matters for corporate export? Evidence from China

2024· article· en· W4401465624 on OpenAlexaff
Qihan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions on Economics Business and Management Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsTaylor College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanel dataBusinessChinaCorporate social responsibilitySustainable developmentIndustrial organizationEconomicsEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Firms' ESG performance is a vital factor for sustainable development. Corporate export, as one of the most significant firm international strategies, plays a crucial role in their decision-making. This study conducts theoretical analysis and empirical tests on the relationship between firm’s ESG performance and corporate export using panel data of Chinese listed companies from 2011 to 2016. We employ the fixed effect regression model based on the panel dataset and find that firm’s ESG performance significantly positively affects corporate export. Our main findings have certain implications for enterprises in coping with sustainable development and empowering the international corporate strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions on Economics Business and Management ResearchSame topicEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207