The enduring effects of antimicrobials and lipopolysaccharide on the cellular mechanisms and behaviours associated with neurodegeneration in pubertal male and female CD1 mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Puberty is a sensitive developmental period during which stressors can cause lasting brain and behavioural deficits. While the acute effects of pubertal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and antimicrobial (AMNS) treatments are known, their enduring impacts on neurodegeneration-related mechanisms and behaviours remain unclear. This study examined these effects in male and female mice. At five weeks old, mice received 200ul of either broad-spectrum antimicrobials or water through oral gavage twice daily for seven days. At six weeks of age, they received an intraperitoneal injection of either saline or LPS. Four weeks later, adult mice underwent neurodegeneration-related behavioural tests, including the rotarod, forepaw stride length, reversed grid hang, open field, and buried pellet tests. Two days after the final test, brain and ileal samples were collected. Results showed that female mice treated with both AMNS and LPS exhibited deficits in neuromuscular strength, while males treated with LPS alone showed increased anxiety-like behaviours. Males treated with AMNS alone had decreased sigma-1 receptor (S1R) expression in the cornu ammonis 1 (CA1) and dentate gyrus (DG), while females treated with both AMNS and LPS had decreased S1R expression. Additionally, males treated with either LPS or AMNS had lower glial-derived neurotrophic factor receptor alpha-1 (GFRA1) expression in the primary motor cortex (M1) than females. Mice treated with LPS alone had decreased GFRA1 expression in the DG and decreased S1R expression in the secondary motor cortex (M2). These findings suggest that pubertal AMNS and LPS treatments may lead to enduring changes in biomarkers and behaviours related to neurodegeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".