MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401479141 · doi:10.56952/arma-2024-0783

Dynamic Stress Wave Behaviors Across Single Fluid-Filled Rock Fractures

2024· article· en· W4401479141 on OpenAlexaff
Hua Yang, Huan‐Feng Duan, Qi Zhao, Jianbo Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Stress waveGeologyGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Dynamic stress waves are commonly encountered in geoengineering operations (e.g., rock blasting and hydraulic fracturing) and natural events (e.g., earthquake ruptures and volcanic eruptions), strongly influencing the deformation and failure of rock masses and rock infrastructures. Understanding dynamic stress wave behavior across rock fractures is essential for mining, tunneling, geothermal energy extraction, and hydrocarbon exploitation. The present study conducted considerable dynamic impact tests on synthetic fluid-filled rock fractures under different saturation conditions through a custom-made split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test system, aiming to quantitatively determine dynamic stress wave behaviors across fluid-filled rock fractures. The SHPB test data were processed to estimate transmission and reflection coefficients, and wave attenuation factors for quantifying dynamic stress wave responses of fluid-filled rock fractures. The experimental results show that increasing water content and decreasing fracture thickness lead to more wave transmission and less wave reflection. Wave attenuation decreases with rising water content within the range of 0% – 75% and reducing fracture thickness. A distinctive finding is that rock fractures fully saturated with water experienced more wave attenuation than those in close-to-saturation scenarios, which could be attributed to the energy consumption induced by the wave-induced fluid flow out of the filled joint (i.e., squirt flow). 1. INTRODUCTION The interaction of seismic waves and fluid-filled rock joints has been a hotspot of geomechanics and geophysics because it is of great importance to reservoir detection and characterization, geothermal exploration and extraction, underground engineering appraisal, exploration seismology, earthquake engineering, etc. (Reiser et al., 2020; Viswanathan et al., 2022). Considerable efforts have been devoted to low-intensity wave behaviors across individual fluid-filled rock fractures via laboratory experiments. Place et al. (2016) performed ultrasonic measurements on single fractures fully filled with air, water, or grouts at different cement contents, where the filling fluid was almost at rest or moving at a controlled flow rate through the fracture. They found that the fluid type highly affects reflected wave spectra and energy, while the internal fluid flow has negligible influences on wave reflection. Kamali-Asl et al. (2019) conducted the flow-through-fracture tests with concurrent measurements of the ultrasonic P- and cross-polarized S-waves propagation along the fracture. Their test results showed that the decreasing fracture aperture caused less P-wave attenuation and higher P-wave velocity while increasing the amplitude of cross-polarized S-waves. Yang et al. (2020, 2021) performed massive ultrasonic pulse-transmission tests on individual fluid-filled rock fractures, clarifying the role of the fluid composition and spatial distribution, fracture orientation, and temperature in P-wave signatures across single fluid-filled rock fractures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→