MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401480165 · doi:10.56238/levv15n39-014

Fornecimento distribuído de água: Uma analogia didática

2024· article· pt· W4401480165 on OpenAlexaff
Zedequias Machado Alves, Lilian De Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueLUMEN ET VIRTUS · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraditional medicineChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A escassez de recursos naturais é um problema recorrente no cotidiano moderno. Muito tem sido feito para encontrar soluções que gerem o mínimo de impacto ambiental e social. Dentre os vários desafios para enfrentar a escassez de recursos, este trabalho apresenta de forma lúdica as questões envolvendo a escassez de recursos hídricos de determinada região e as soluções encontradas pela sociedade de seu entorno. O trabalho aborda a importância das soluções apresentadas atenderem as necessidades de todos. O formato do problema e das soluções apresentadas é baseado no texto “A fábula dos porcos assados”. É abordada a questão da escassez d’agua, sendo qualquer semelhança com a escassez de recursos energéticos e uso de Geração Distribuída (GD) mera coincidência, ou não.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLUMEN ET VIRTUSSame topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207