Alveolar wall hyperelastic material properties determined using alveolar cluster model with experimental stress-stretch and pressure-volume data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micro-scale models of lung tissue have been employed by researchers to investigate alveolar mechanics; however, they have been limited by the lack of biofidelic material properties for the alveolar wall. To address this challenge, a finite element model of an alveolar cluster was developed comprising a tetrakaidecahedron array with the nominal characteristics of human alveolar structure. Lung expansion was simulated in the model by prescribing a pressure and monitoring the volume, to produce a pressure-volume (PV) response that could be compared to experimental PV data. The alveolar wall properties in the model were optimized to match experimental PV response of lungs filled with saline, to eliminate surface tension effects and isolate the alveolar wall tissue response. When simulated in uniaxial tension, the model was in agreement with reported experimental properties of uniaxial tension on excised lung tissue. The work presented herein was able to link micro-scale alveolar response to two disparate macroscopic experimental datasets (stress-stretch and PV response of lung) and presents hyperelastic properties of the alveolar wall for use in alveolar scale finite element models and multi-scale models. Future research will incorporate surface tension effects, and investigate alveolar injury mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".