MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401481353 · doi:10.56952/arma-2024-0640

Generation of Micro-Fracture Clouds in Rocks: Mechanisms and Applications

2024· article· en· W4401481353 on OpenAlexaff
Uno Mutlu, G. N. Boitnott, A. Lisjak, O. K. Mahabadi, Taghi Sherizadeh, Doğukan Güner, Samuel Nowak, Ahmad Ghassemi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFracture (geology)Materials scienceGeologyComputer scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Volume increasing or decreasing processes in rocks can lead to inter or intragranular fractures in subsurface formations. The volume change can be caused by chemical reactions involving fluid, reactive transport, and coupling with the mechanical deformation of the grains. Depending on stress, material properties and coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical (THMC) conditions, grain scale fractures may propagate and coalesce, forming a cloud of well-connected fracture networks. The mechanisms responsible for propagation, coalescence and inhibition of cloud fractures are not well known. In this study, we review coupled micro-fracture network generation mechanisms as published in the literature and observed in field, experiments, and models. We then introduce simple (decoupled or weakly coupled) models within the framework of analytical and hybrid finite-discrete element models (FDEM). We discuss key parameters that promote (or limit) the generation of micro-fracture clouds under in-situ conditions. Based on the review of literature and preliminary model results, we discuss the implications of micro-fracture generation mechanisms on subsurface storage, hydrogen exploration/production and super-hot supercritical geothermal technologies. 1. INTRODUCTION Rock deformation and fracturing characteristics under high temperature and pressure (HTHP) conditions are of fundamental significance to emerging subsurface engineering technologies such as super-hot supercritical thermal resources, hydrogen and CO2 storage, and geologic hydrogen production. To unlock the full potential of these applications, it is important to fundamentally understand the fracture initiation, propagation, coalescence and resulting permeability alteration processes and be able to model them at different scales (grain to wellbore to reservoir scale) within the framework of Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC) coupled HTHP systems. For example, serpentinization is a THMC coupled process that occurs when mafic and ultra-mafic rocks come in to contact with water at specific pressure-temperature conditions to produce hydrogen. This reaction can lead to a significant volume increase, swelling pressures and associated micro-fracture clouds: which in turn can generate additional permeability pathways for flow. Continuous flow of water and mineralization can lead to favorable conditions for a self-driven micro-fracture network, as this process can repeat in a loop: creating a progressive change in host rock permeability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→