MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401481468 · doi:10.56952/arma-2024-1198

Design and Implementation of Innovative, Openable, In-Trench Rockfall Catchment Fences for Improvement of Worker Safety in Steep Slope Pipeline Construction

2024· article· en· W4401481468 on OpenAlexaffabout
C. Hajen, Liju Philip, J. Gesche, Amy J. Burgin, Joy S. Nichols, A. Bichler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRockfallTrenchPipeline (software)GeologyCatchment areaLandslideDrainage basinEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: This paper presents the implementation of an in-trench rockfall catchment system on a steep slope in the Coast Mountains of British Columbia. Using a combination of drone photogrammetry, digital geological mapping, change detection tracking, and numerical rockfall modeling, Stantec identified a rockfall hazard presenting a high risk to the workers and equipment in the trench downslope. Using numerical modeling and field observations of rockfall trajectories, the construction team sought to design a rockfall mitigation system to control the rockfall hazard while satisfying a tight construction timeline and the need for an openable, gate-like design. The solution was a series of 100 kJ rock catchment fences- each 3 m high and spanning the 5 m wide trench, secured to the granodiorite trench walls with grouted dowels. The gate-style rockfall mitigation design is, to the team's knowledge, the first of its kind to be implemented in pipeline construction. The design was successfully used throughout the approximately 6-week period of pipe installation on the slope, marking a successful solution to a unique construction challenge. 1. BACKGROUND Coastal GasLink is a 670 km (420 mi) long pipeline which will transport natural gas from Groundbirch to Kitimat, British Columbia, across some of the most rugged alpine terrain in Canada. The approved Coastal GasLink route was determined by considering Indigenous, landowner and stakeholder input, the environment, archaeological and cultural values, land use compatibility, safety, constructability, and economics. The slope of interest for this paper is within Section 8 West of the pipeline alignment- a 13 km (8 mi) long span, fraught with geohazards, across the highest passes of the Coast Mountain Range, see Fig 1. Further details of the Coastal GasLink are provided in Coastal GasLink (2023). The slope designated Steep Slope 6B (SS6B) by the project team is the focus of this paper, and the site at which the gate-style rockfall catchment fence system was implemented. SS6B is 250 m (820 ft) long and is sloped at approximately 30 degrees. It is located near the junction of two converging glacial valleys in the headwaters of the Kitimat River. At an elevation of 860 m (2820 ft), SS6B is approximately halfway between the glaciofluvial and colluvial debris in the valley bottoms and the 2000 m (6500 ft) high, glacially-eroded mountain peaks which surround both valleys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures→French-language works237,207→