MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401481766 · doi:10.56952/arma-2024-0085

A Comprehensive Comparison Between Discrete Fracture Network and Generalized Anisotropic Material Behavior for Modeling Jointed Rock Mass

2024· article· en· W4401481766 on OpenAlexaff
B. H. Ko, S. Moallemi, Hoang K. Dang, Thamer Yacoub

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsRocscience (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnisotropyRock mass classificationFracture (geology)Materials scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Rock masses are blocky assemblages formed by networks of natural discontinuities (fractures), such as joints, foliations, shear zones or faults, formed by geological activities. To accurately predict the mechanical behavior of rock mass, it is essential to consider these fractures. The complex interaction between intact rock and those fractures coupled with man-made excavation imposes critical limitations to predict rock mass behavior solely via kinematic or analytical methods. In this context, numerical modeling approach fills the need for a powerful tool that can provide geotechnical engineers with sophisticated solutions to complex rock mechanics problems. This paper demonstrates different approaches to model joint sets in 3D Finite Element Method (FEM) to model discontinuities in jointed open pit mine. They include the explicit representation of discontinuities using Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) and incorporation of a special constitutive model that considers anisotropic material behavior to the solid elements that implicitly account for the presence of joint sets. The investigation presents findings from simulations involving models with single and multiple joint sets. Notably, the focus is given to validating the use of DFN and the benefits for slope stability assessment. The obtained results showed high levels of agreement between the two modeling approaches, underscoring the efficacy of DFN in replicating the complex behavior of geological structures. These insights contribute to the enhancement of the rock slope designs with significant implications for the safety and profitability of mining operations. 1. INTRODUCTION In open pit mining, the primary objective is to maintain the structural integrity of the slope surface and prevent/mitigate any potential failures. Achieving a cost-effective yet stable design for open-pit mines requires a comprehensive grasp of lithology, rock mass characteristics, and structural geology. Thus, conducting a robust slope stability assessment for open pit excavations is of utmost importance to ensure the safety of mining operations. The presence of geological structures (also termed as natural discontinuities) such as joints, foliations, and faults within rock mass introduces complexities in stress distribution and stability, which are unique to the geological history of different regions. Therefore, a thorough consideration of natural discontinuities is imperative in geomechanical analyses and design exercises to gain accurate prediction of rock mass behavior. They play a pivotal role in controlling the driving failure mechanism to slope instability. With respect to the distribution, surface condition, and orientations of discontinuities, the mechanical response of rock mass should vary extensively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207