MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401482693 · doi:10.1002/cpz1.1120

Setting Up the JBrowse 2 Genome Browser

2024· article· en· W4401482693 on OpenAlexaff
Colin Diesh, Robert Buels, Garrett Stevens, Caroline Bridge, Scott Cain, Lincoln Stein, Ian Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsComputational biologyGenomeComputer scienceBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JBrowse 2 is a modular genome browser that can visualize many common genomic file formats. While JBrowse 2 supports a variety of different usages, it is particularly suited for deployment on websites, such as model organism databases or other web-based genomic data resources. This protocol provides detailed instructions for setting up JBrowse 2 on an Ubuntu Linux web server, loading a reference genome from a FASTA format file, and adding a gene annotation track from a GFF3 format file. By the end of the protocol, users will have a working JBrowse 2 instance that is accessible via the web. © 2024 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Setting up JBrowse 2 on your web server.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0930.163

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent ProtocolsSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207