Cardiac Rehabilitation for Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome Remission: Impact of Ultraprocessed Food–Intake Reduction and Time-Restricted Eating in the DIABEPIC-1 Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation programs provide a valuable opportunity to promote the adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviors in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs) and metabolic comorbidities, including metabolic syndrome and prediabetes. However, strategies to reverse these conditions remain to be explored. The DIABEPIC-1 study aimed to assess the feasibility of an enhanced 6-month cardiac rehabilitation program for patients with ASCVD while investigating prediabetes and metabolic syndrome remission. Methods: The study combined exercise training with a comprehensive nutritional intervention, emphasizing reduction in intake of ultraprocessed foods, adoption of a Mediterranean diet, and implementation of time-restricted eating. Baseline, 3-month, and 6-month assessments included segmental body-composition measurements, blood analysis, maximal exercise testing, nutritional diaries recorded with the Keenoa AI app, and lifestyle questionnaires. Remission criteria included a return to an HbA1c level of < 5.7%, and < 3 National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP/ATP-III) criteria for prediabetes and metabolic syndrome, respectively. Results: < 0.001) were observed. Improvement in glycemic and lipid profiles, insulin-resistance marker levels, and liver health were noted. Participants enhanced their cardiorespiratory fitness, reduced their consumption of ultraprocessed food, and increased their adherence to the Mediterranean diet and time-restricted eating. Notably, 50% achieved prediabetes remission, and 70% with metabolic syndrome at baseline achieved remission. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the possibility of enhancing cardiac rehabilitation with an intensive nutritional intervention, yielding clinically significant outcomes, including remission of key risk factors in a substantial number of ASCVD patients. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05459987.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".