MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401486285 · doi:10.1016/j.commt.2024.100009

Unveiling Novel Direct Bandgap Allotropes of Germanium: A Computational Exploration

2024· article· en· W4401486285 on OpenAlexafffund
Mangladeep Bhullar, Akinwumi Akinpelu, Yansun Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational Materials Today · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsGermaniumBand gapDiamondDiamond cubicMaterials scienceDirect and indirect band gapsSemiconductorElectronic band structureBrillouin zoneAtom (system on chip)SiliconGermanium compoundsCondensed matter physicsCrystallographyOptoelectronicsChemistryPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Germanium crystallizes in a cubic diamond structure, which restricts its applications in optoelectronics due to its indirect band gap. However, the slight energy difference between the direct and indirect band gaps in germanium presents a promising opportunity to engineer its structure into a direct band gap material, with the hexagonal diamond (lonsdaleite) phase being a notable example. In this study, we conducted an extensive computational search to find germanium allotropes with a direct band gap and low energy using a sensible random structure search approach informed by data-derived interatomic potentials. Among the predicted allotropes, we identified a hexagonal 8H structure with the lowest energy compared to all known germanium allotropes and only 5 meV/atom above the ground state cubic diamond structure. Compared to the cubic diamond phase, which has complete cubicity, the 8H phase consists of 3/4 cubicity and 1/4 hexagonality. This structural motif, coupled with band structure back folding in the hexagonal Brillouin zone, results in a direct band gap of 0.25 eV. Given the prior experimental discovery of 2H and 4H polytypes, the experimental synthesis of the 8H allotrope in germanium is highly feasible. Future research could explore alloying 8H germanium with silicon to optimize the bandgap energy and optical transitions, potentially achieving lifetimes comparable to those of group III-V semiconductors like GaAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputational Materials TodaySame topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207