Cardiovascular risk in ANCA-associated vasculitis: Monocyte phenotyping reveals distinctive signatures between serological subsets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, particularly the myeloperoxidase AAV serotype (MPO-AAV). Distinct alterations in monocyte phenotypes may cause accelerated atherosclerotic disease in AAV. METHODS: A cohort including 43 AAV patients and 19 healthy controls was included for downstream analyses. Extensive phenotyping of monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages was performed using bulk RNA-sequencing and flow cytometry. An in vitro transendothelial migration assay reflecting intrinsic adhesive and migratory capacities of monocytes was employed. Subsequent sub-analyses were performed to investigate differences between serological subtypes. RESULTS: Monocyte subset analysis showed increased classical monocytes during active disease, whereas non-classical monocytes were decreased compared to healthy controls (HC). RNA-sequencing revealed upregulation of distinct inflammatory pathways and lipid metabolism-related markers in monocytes of active AAV patients. No differences were detected in the intrinsic monocyte adhesion and migration capacity. Compared to proteinase-3(PR3)-AAV, monocytes of MPO-AAV patients in remission expressed genes related to inflammation, coagulation, platelet-binding and interferon signalling, whereas the expression of chemokine receptors indicative of acute inflammation and monocyte extravasation (i.e., CCR2 and CCR5) was increased in monocytes of PR3-AAV patients. During active disease, PR3-AAV was linked with elevated serum CRP and increased platelet counts compared to MPO-AAV. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight changes in monocyte subset composition and activation, but not in the intrinsic migration capacity of AAV monocytes. MPO-AAV monocytes are associated with sustained upregulation of inflammatory genes, whereas PR3-AAV monocytes exhibit chemokine receptor upregulation. These molecular changes may play a role in elevating cardiovascular risk as well as in the underlying pathophysiology of AAV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".