MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Quantifying the Impact of River Discharge on Nearshore Sea Ice in the Alaskan Arctic

2024· preprint· en· W4401487847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kennedy Lange, Angela C. Bliss

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceArctic ice packOceanographyCryosphereEnvironmental scienceArctic sea ice declineDeltaArcticAntarctic sea iceDischargeClimatologyDrift iceRiver deltaPhysical geographyGeologyGeographyDrainage basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic is increasingly vulnerable to global warming, leading to shortening winter seasons, later freezes, and earlier breakups of sea ice. This project quantifies changes in sea ice seasonality from 1979 - 2023 using passive microwave data and sea ice climate indicator variables. Our results are consistent with those previously published by Bliss et al. (2019) finding statistically significant positive trends in the ice-free season length. We find the most rapid changes in the Chukchi Sea off the northwestern coast of Alaska. Based on current trends, we find that this region could become ice-free in the next 80 years. We also quantify the impact of river discharge on nearshore sea ice, finding correlation between the peak discharge and 90% sea ice concentration threshold dates for the region adjacent to the Mackenzie River delta. The same relationship does not exist near the Yukon River delta, with sea ice melting approximately 60 days before river discharge peaks. These findings will support future work analyzing the impact of ice on Arctic coastal biogeochemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→