Event-related potential (P300) abnormalities and linked autoantibodies as a marker of early Cognitive dysfunction in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus a case - control study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: SLE patients frequently have primary central nervous system involvement. Cognitive changes, seizures, psychosis, and headache are a few of the symptoms. P300 is an electrical marker of disrupted CNS that is utilized to identify cognitive dysfunction even at the subclinical stage. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Questionnaire (MoCA) has been used to detect moderate cognitive impairment.Objective: Our study aims to assess and early detection of cognitive dysfunction in SLE (NPSLE or non-NPSLE) patients with P300 latency and MoCA. And to determine the relation of different SLE auto-antibodies and impaired P300 hence as a marker for cognitive dysfunction.Results: Our study included 60 (57 female and 3 male) adult SLE patients with a mean age of 30 years old and 30 (26 female and 4 males) as a control group with a mean age of 34 Years. Regardless of whether there are evident or hidden CNS abnormalities, our current investigation demonstrated that ERP abnormalities are present in SLE patients. All SLE patients had significantly longer P300 delay with lower MoCA scores, indicating that P300 and MoCA are likely connected. Numerous autoantibodies were linked to P300 abnormalities. Conclusion: EP and ERP are electrophysiological indicators of abnormal CNS activity, even in the preclinical state. P300 can be thought of as a biomarker for early CNS impairment in SLE. numerous autoantibodies were linked to P300 aberrations and may be used as a marker for the onset of cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".