MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401496144 · doi:10.5376/tgmb.2024.14.0004

Agronomic Traits of Cassava and Their Genetic Bases: A Focus on Yield and Quality Improvements

2024· article· en· W4401496144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTree Genetics and Molecular Breeding · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCassava research and cyanide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYield (engineering)Quality (philosophy)Focus (optics)BiotechnologyBiologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a key food and industrial crop in the global tropics, valued for its high adaptability to marginal soil conditions and the starch-rich nature of its roots. As the global population continues to grow and climate change becomes more severe, the scientific community is seeking to address the challenges of food security and agricultural sustainability by improving cassava production and processing quality. This paper reviews the research progress of cassava agronomic traits and genetic basis in recent years, with special attention paid to the mining of genetic diversity, improvement of agronomic traits and application of modern biotechnology in cassava breeding. Studies have shown that the combination of traditional selective breeding, molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS), gene editing and other technologies has greatly improved the cassava root yield and starch quality. In addition, the implementation of precision agronomic technology and smart agriculture provides new possibilities for optimizing cassava production management and improving its environmental adaptability. The paper also discusses the direction of future cassava research, including further development of genetic resources, improving cassava's resilience to environmental changes and its role in the global food system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it