MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401498232 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.11.607498

Adversarial learning enables unbiased organism-wide cross-species alignment of single-cell RNA data at scale

2024· preprint· en· W4401498232 on OpenAlexaff
J. Javier Díaz-Mejía, Elias Williams, Brendan T. Innes, Octavian Focsa, Dylan Mendonca, Swechha Singh, Allison M.L. Nixon, Ronen Schuster, Matthew B. Buechler, Boris Hinz, Sam Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoToronto Centre for Phenogenomics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganismAdversarial systemComputational biologyComputer scienceRNAModel organismBiologyArtificial intelligenceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Today’s single-cell RNA (scRNA) datasets remain siloed, due to significant challenges associated with their integration at scale. Moreover, most scRNA analysis tools that operate at scale leverage supervised techniques that are insufficient for cell-type identification and discovery. Here, we demonstrate that the alignment of scRNA data using unsupervised models is accurate at an organism-wide scale and between species. To do this, we show adversarial training of a deep-learning model we term batch-adversarial single-cell variational inference (BA-scVI) can be employed to align standardized benchmark datasets comprising dozens of scRNA studies spanning tissues in humans and mice. In the aligned space, we analyze cell types that span tissues in both species and find prevalent complement expressing macrophages and fibroblasts. We provide access to the tools presented via an online interface for atlas exploration and reference-based drag-and-drop alignment of new data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207