Automated crack identification in structures using acoustic waveforms and deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structural elements undergo multiple levels of damage at various locations due to environments and critical loading conditions. The level of damage and its location can be predicted using acoustic emission (AE) waveforms that are captured from the generation of inherent microcracks. Existing AE methods are reliant on the feature selection of the captured waveforms and may be subjective in nature. To automate this process, this paper proposes a deep-learning model to predict the damage severity and its expected location using AE waveforms. The model is based on a densely connected convolutional neural network (CNN) that offers superior feature extraction and minimal training data requirements. Time-domain AE waveforms are used as inputs of the proposed model to automate the process of predicting the severity of damage and identifying the expected location of the damage in structural elements. The proposed approach is validated using AE data collected from a concrete beam and a wooden beam and plate. The results show the capability of the proposed method for predicting the level of damage with an accuracy range of 92-95% and identifying the approximate location of damage with 90-100% accuracy. Thus, the proposed method serves as a robust technique for damage severity prediction and localization in civil structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".